This morning my 5 year old was singing Let It Snow and I realized something. A lot of Christmas songs start playing in November, but are about the snow that (in Michigan) we usually don’t see until January.
Frosty the Snowman? Dude is not getting built until February.
Let It Snow? The weather outside is mild.
Winter Wonderland? Astronomical winter doesn’t start until December 21. You probably aren’t going to have snow glistening in your lane for another month.
The song that gets it right is White Christmas. I’m dreaming of a 36% chance of a white Christmas. And as the climate changes, that 36% is going to 📉
My point, if I have one, is that radio stations should start separating the Christmas music from the winter music, and milk the seasonal playlist for another 6 weeks until mid-February
When I set up my home office in 2015, I knew I wanted a motorized standing desk. The easier it is to raise and lower, the less commitment there is in standing up. The less commitment, the easier it is to stand up. At the time, IKEA had just released their Bekant Sit/Stand desk for about 2/3 the cost of the competition. I wish I had paid more to get a better desk.
The problem: It’s well documented that the Bekant has a power supply issue. The symptom is that it stops after raising just a few millimeters, then later refuses to move at all. This is caused by the power supply not putting out enough juice, according to some reports. My desk got stuck in a standing position for a week, maybe the longest work week I’ve had.
The workaround: Unplug the power supply when you are not actively raising or lowering the desk. Leave it unplugged until the moment you feel like switching between sitting and standing. I’ve been doing this for the past week and have had extremely consistent success. My power supply is hanging in the netting under the desk so I just need to pop the cord into that. No need to mess with the outlet.
The real fix: Keep returning your power supply to IKEA until you get one that works. Some people report never having an issue, and maybe you will get a power supply as glorious as theirs.
The good news is that the desk has a 10 year warranty – if you have your receipt. And your return will be much smoother if you get an employee who doesn’t demand that you disassemble your entire desk just for a detachable power supply.
I was lucky to have an employee tell me that they accept scanned copies of receipts, so mine lives in Evernote and comes out once a year when I want to try to fix my desk yet again. It takes about an hour to do the exchange in my experience, and I’m on my 3rd power supply. I also happen to live 10 minutes from an IKEA; I can’t imagine driving a couple of hours to do the exchange.
Update: Feb 11, 2021: My desk has been working fine for the past couple years. The current power supply works great. I would recommend a Bekant now, assuming that they’ve fixed the power supply issues.
I started this blog in May of 2003. I had a LiveJournal at one point, and even wrote my own blog system to teach myself a new language called PHP. But this blog, 90% Crud, started then. I used Movable Type, a Perl CGI application. I wrote some stuff, met some good folks and was inspired to do some neat stuff.
I started this blog in May of 2015. My friend Adam and I wound up looking at some old blog posts with one day and there were some good ones. I thought that maybe that was something worth doing again, even if I never really figured out what I was doing the first time around. I set up a WordPress site and started writing again.
Now that this site is at a new home and I’m working for the WordPress.com company I thought I should finally get my old archives into my new blog. And I did, I managed to export my old blog and import it here. But there was some manual work and I actually had to look at what my old blog was.
For the record, I try to look at nostalgia as an indulgence. Too much time looking back keeps you from looking ahead. But its still something you should do, from time to time.
Seeing the old posts, I’m struck by how many comments there are. I guess there are plenty of comments on blogs these days, but now they’re all on the ephemeral social shares instead of the blog. 20 comments on Facebook, 0 on the blog. That makes sense in some ways.
Looking back helps me figure out what I should put here in the future. I’ll be posting more personal stuff here. I’ll keep posting political stuff when I’m fired up. And I’ll try to keep doing projects, even as my free time dwindles.
Anyway, enough delay, I know you want to get Movable Type 2.64 running on macOS Sierra. Here’s how:
To start with, make sure you have a copy of Movable Type 2.64. Maybe in your backups somewhere. Do a find, because it’s not in the directory that you think. Look for mt.cgi. Put that in /Library/WebServer/CGI-Executables and the corresponding static assets in /Library/WebServer/Documents/.
Edit /etc/apache2/httpd.conf and uncomment AddHandler cgi-script .cgi. Marvel that we used to write Perl CGI scripts, ignorant of how slow it was to spin up a new process for each request. sudo apachectl restart
You’ll also need a MySQL dump of the database. You have it somewhere, even a decade and a dozen computers later.
Now you should brew install mariadb since you’ve heard thats what people use now instead of MySQL. Load that up with good old mysql -u root < mysql-dump.sql
Go to http://localhost/cgi-bin/mt/mt-check.cgi and realize you don’t have the DBD::mysql Perl module installed. Try sudo perl -MCPAN -e 'install DBD::mysql' but some of the tests fail for some reason. Find the directory in ~/.cpan/build, do a make install --force and hope those tests didn’t matter. Be glad for your time as a Perl guy.
It’s no secret that bandwidth concerns have been one of the more pressing issues surrounding the BitTorrent community. CacheLogic, which provides P2P caching solutions for ISP networks, has previously calculated that approximately 60% of a networks bandwidth is consumed by the BitTorrent protocol. This average varies according to the ISP, as some ISPs report less bandwidth consumption and other reporting more.
But that’s the real issue here-are CacheLogic’s numbers correct? Look at what CacheLogic sells: P2P caching appliances. Their entire business is built around reducing the amount of bandwith P2P applications use. And they are also the sole source of numbers saying that P2P applications are using lots of bandwidth.
I’m not saying that their numbers are all wrong, I’m saying that I don’t know what the truth is. A press release from a company that has a direct and obvious profit motive from over-hyping shouldn’t be treated as a solid fact. Unfortunately a highly-suspect number is far more attractive to a writer than saying “I don’t know what the truth is.”
CacheLogic seem to have been pretty successful at getting their numbers into the collective consciousness. Traditional media like Wired Magazine, BBC and Reuters trumpet the numbers as if they were a fundamental rule of the internet (like Rule #34: There is porn of it. No exceptions.). Then, the numbers are repeated ad nauseam until sites like Slyck News can pepper a story with them without even needing to cite the source, since everyone knows it’s true.
Let’s stop pretending we know things that we don’t. There’s nothing wrong with saying “I don’t know,” there is something wrong with pretending you know what you really don’t. Let’s get our numbers from someone who isn’t trying to sell us a solution to the problem the numbers describe.
Anyway, the New York Times, obviously concerned with my feelings on the matters, took it upon themselves to hire Khoi Vinh from Behavior (via). Mr. Vinh was part of The Onion’s redesign and was no doubt hired to give the Times the same credibility as “America’s Finest News Source.”
I can only take from this acquisition a sense of the immense power that I wield with my blog, and will promise to only use it for good. This will largely be accomplished through posting infrequently about hyper-technical topics, per current operating policy. I also look forward NYTimes.com switching to Drupal.
While this shouldn’t be considered a definitive guide to Amazon’s Mechanical Turk, my friend posted his experiences to his private blog and I thought I’d share (with his permission, of course).
First off, if you’re not familiar with the service it’s a way to pool human talent over the Internet. There are some tasks that people are just better at, like typing the name of a pictured album cover or transcribing a minute of audio. Amazon pays people to perform these tasks (called “Human Intelligence Tasks” or HITs), and people can pay Amazon to have these tasks performed. Ingenious, the same way eBay or the Wikipedia is.
OK, here’s what my friend in the program had to say:
There are a few problems with the system that make completing HITs more difficult than it needs to be. For example, you must first look at a possible task, then click to accept the task, then complete the task and hit submit. That’s a 3 step process that could be easily streamlined. You’re wasting time that could be used more efficently completing tasks. A lot of the time, by the time the page loads and you click to accept a task, someone else has already accepted it forcing you to do it again. Luckily the geek community has come up several greasemonkey scripts that automatically accepts hits for you and makes submitting them easier by stripping away extraneous images and text. I personally use TurkOp with the Opera web browser. I use Opera simply for the fact that it’s a different browser than my primary browser, FireFox. This makes it easy for me as everything is contained in a seperate browser that I can have set up just for that task, while leaving other web browsing alone.
I have been doing this in my spare time for about two weeks now (a few minutes here and there, or maybe I’ll sit down for a session on the weekend and blow through a few hundred) and I’ve already earned over $150.
I was surprised at how much money he was able to make in the program. It’s not enough to live on, but it’s more profitable than spending downtime playing a Flash game (or, uh, blogging). Anyway, I thought it was interesting to find out how the program is paying out and figured I’d share.
I’ve got a followup to my earlier post about Buy.com. My girlfriend submitted a complaint to Michigan’s Attorney General’s office on their website describing her experience. They then contacted Buy.com, who decided not only to finally ship her bag but they also gave it to her for free!
It was certainly a good resolution on their part, but I think she would have rather just gotten the bag at the listed price when she bought it without having 4 months of uncertainty. It’s a shame that she couldn’t resolve this with Buy.com’s support and was forced to contact the AG.
Here’s the minor magic: instead of going directly to the link I edited it to add what I had initially guessed it would be tagged as. That way I’ll be able to find it by tag next time, which is a lot faster than searching, since I have a pretty good idea what tag I’ll be using next time.
Not rocket science, just a good habit to get into.
Of course next time I need that specific link I’ll probably just go to my search bar instead of my address bar, because I remember what I blogged better than what I bookmarked. But that’s just me and my crazy, kooky brain but you get the general principle.
While we are America’s Finest News Source™, we are such only in so far as it makes us money. Lots of money. We’re not all that concerned with an “informed populace,” except where that populace is informed by our advertisers. Therefore, we are happy to show you our complete archives online, with informative information from our many sponsors.
Listen, we’re the paper of fucking record. We make sure the public is informed, and the best way to do that is to protect our archives. You wouldn’t let a kid covered in mud sit down at a grand piano, why would you want just anyone to browse through your archives. That’s right, your archives. The archives are yours and mine and everyone’s, assuming everyone coughs up $40.
Oh, you want us to be more like The Onion? Well I got news for you, kid. We’re so noble in our aspirations, we barely have any ads (unlike a certain other paper I could name). Take an article page example. We have a mere one interstitial, and then when you finally get to the page we only use half the page width for our giant towering ad, aside from the assorted ads at the bottom.
We’re not a big organization like The Onion either. Sorry, we’re just not. How many people do they have, 100,000? A million? No one really knows, but how do you expect us to be able to compete with a giant newspaper like them? We’re just one little paper, we can’t be held to the same standards for openness as The Onion.
So now if you are looking for someone, you need to search a bunch of websites to find them and you’re never quite sure if there’s one more site that you missed that says the person you’re looking for is OK. Tyranny of choice indeed.
By trying to solve one problem, the geeks caused another one. It’s understandable. Geeks want to help too and this is how some knew how to do it.
Telling people “leave it to the experts” doesn’t generally work, and maybe that’s a good thing. The solution needs to allow people to pitch in and help, while at the same time getting the best information out.
Before the next emergency, the Red Cross should create web services that allow anyone to tie into the Red Cross’s search facility. This allows people to pitch in and help, to do smart things that make the search more useful, while at the same time getting the information out to everyone who needs it.
There are a few ways to do it, such as allowing sites to query the Red Cross for searches (to allow mashups like missing people on Google Maps or SMS) or aggregating searches like A9 OpenSearch. Those aren’t mutually exclusive and there are other things they can do too. The Red Cross’s geeks should know what’s possible with their setup so I won’t pretend to give them specific advice, just ask that they help the internet community to help them.
I’m not saying that this is a major victory over hurricanes or anything. Now is not the time to come up with a web services strategy. People in the Astrodome do not need Friendster or blogs or web services; they need water, food and hygienic conditions. Once it’s time to start preparing for the next emergency, that’s when it’s time to start working on this.
Also also, if you follow the “do not need Friendster” link above, you get to a blog post that I had assumed was just some well-intentioned geek far removed from the action. Instead, it’s actually a recommendation from someone who was in the Astrodome. More in this comment.